{"id":164,"date":"2008-02-07T06:00:18","date_gmt":"2008-02-07T13:00:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.washingtonwinemaker.com\/blog\/2008\/02\/07\/five-meads-are-we-there-yet\/"},"modified":"2008-02-07T06:00:18","modified_gmt":"2008-02-07T13:00:18","slug":"five-meads-are-we-there-yet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/washingtonwinemaker.com\/blog\/2008\/02\/07\/five-meads-are-we-there-yet\/","title":{"rendered":"Five Meads: Are we there yet?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I looked in on five meads yesterday to see if they were ready to bottle. I was looking for clarity, I tasted them to see if they were pleasant to drink, and I measured the specific gravity (SG), pH, and titratable acidity (TA).<\/p>\n<table style=\"border-collapse: collapse\" border=\"0\" cellpadding=\"4\" width=\"80%\">\n<tr>\n<td><strong>Name<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>SG<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>pH<\/strong><\/td>\n<td><strong>TA (g\/L)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2004 Plain Mead<\/td>\n<td>1.001<\/td>\n<td>3.05<\/td>\n<td>5<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2005 Apple Mead<\/td>\n<td>0.995<\/td>\n<td>3.39<\/td>\n<td>5.2<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2006 Experiment (boiled)<\/td>\n<td>1.000<\/td>\n<td>3.27<\/td>\n<td>6<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2006 Experiment (no heat)<\/td>\n<td>1.000<\/td>\n<td>3.29<\/td>\n<td>5.3<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2006 Grape Mead<\/td>\n<td>1.000<\/td>\n<td>3.51<\/td>\n<td>5+<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/table>\n<p><strong>Ready or not, this four year old mead is going in a bottle<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I tasted sweetness on the 2004 plain mead, despite the low SG. It had that distinctive, pleasant aroma that I&#8217;ve come to associate with mead, and the lady of the house thought it was, &#8220;a little young, but it&#8217;s going to be good.&#8221; I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m as patient as she is, so I&#8217;m going to bottle it.<\/p>\n<p><strong>This apple mead is the only one not ready to bottle<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The 2005 apple mead tasted and smelled of apple, but only a hint. I thought it was a little tart. It was the only one of the lot that I thought wasn&#8217;t clear enough to bottle.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Trying to settle a long running debate<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The 2006 experiment is a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonwinemaker.com\/blog\/2007\/06\/05\/making-mead-the-controversy-over-boiling\/\">test<\/a> of the idea that boiling a mead&#8217;s honey-water mixture before pitching the yeast impairs the aroma by driving off volatile compounds. I split a batch, boiled one and made the other without heating. That was two years ago, and I think these meads are ready to bottle. I normally age mead for three years though, so I may let them age in the bottle then have a tasting party next February.<\/p>\n<p><em><strong>Update 10\/28\/2008 &#8211; The results are in!<\/strong><br \/>\nIt was a long running experiment with a little surprise at the end. Follow this link to see the results of my <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonwinemaker.com\/blog\/2008\/10\/28\/making-mead-testing-the-controversy-over-boiling\/\">mead boiling test<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><strong>The trouble with titration<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>The 2006 grape mead is made from the pomace of my <a href=\"http:\/\/www.washingtonwinemaker.com\/blog\/2007\/06\/12\/my-smallest-batch-a-500-ml-leon-millot-pinot-noir-blend\/\">smallest batch<\/a> of wine ever. I added honey, water, nutrient, and cream of tartar. I had some trouble checking the TA on this one because I ran short of sodium hydroxide, the base I use to titrate acid in a wine sample. I added 5 ml to the sample, and that brought the pH to 7.4. That&#8217;s very close to the end point. If I really had reached the end point, it would have indicated a TA of 5 g\/L. It&#8217;s a bit more, maybe 5.25 g\/L, but since I can&#8217;t be sure I just noted &#8220;5+&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Hmm, that acid measuring contraption I wrote about the other day just looks better and better.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I looked in on five meads yesterday to see if they were ready to bottle. I was looking for clarity, I tasted them to see if they were pleasant to drink, and I measured the specific gravity (SG), pH, and titratable acidity (TA). Name SG pH TA (g\/L) 2004 Plain Mead 1.001 3.05 5 2005 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[12,22,23,33,34,41],"tags":[48],"class_list":["post-164","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-enology","category-mead","category-measurement-testing","category-storage-and-aging","category-tasting","category-winemaking","tag-nad"],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/washingtonwinemaker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/washingtonwinemaker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/washingtonwinemaker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/washingtonwinemaker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/washingtonwinemaker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=164"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/washingtonwinemaker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/164\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/washingtonwinemaker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=164"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/washingtonwinemaker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=164"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/washingtonwinemaker.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=164"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}